SEATTLE FAIR GROWTH
  • Home
  • About
    • Affordability >
      • Metrics
    • Displacement
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Communities
    • Missing Middle Fact Sheet
    • FAQ
    • Real People Real Stories
    • Articles
  • Blog
  • Join
  • Donate
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • About
    • Affordability >
      • Metrics
    • Displacement
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Communities
    • Missing Middle Fact Sheet
    • FAQ
    • Real People Real Stories
    • Articles
  • Blog
  • Join
  • Donate
  • Facebook

our Blog: The talk of the town

The Grand Bargain is a Grand Giveaway

11/21/2016

2 Comments

 
Picture

by Jon Lisbin

The Seattle City Council is considering massive upzones in the University District as the first implementation of it's "Inclusionary Housing" strategies throughout the city.

Truth is, if I was Mayor, I may have taken the same approach. Put together a panel of experts and stakeholders to come up with strategies to address Seattle’s affordable housing crisis. Unfortunately, that’s where intelligence ended and corruption began. The composition of HALA (Housing and Livability Agenda) Committee was heavily weighted toward developers and their interests.  The resulting skewed report was biased towards special interests.

I know, at this point you are saying “another conspiracy theorist”. However, the facts behind my assertion are quite compelling.  Maybe I can speak in a language city officials are familiar with?
  1. Whereas, of the 65 HALA strategies there are few if any recommendations that actually address livability, ie. “No L in HALA”
  2. Whereas the City Council is focused on only one HALA strategy; upzoning?
  3. Whereas the city’s set asides that developers are required to contribute towards affordable housing, pale compared to other cities.
  4. Whereas government intervention of market forces, intended to help the poor with housing, has historically failed.
  5. Whereas, impact fees that would potentially moderate development, add value to neighborhoods, and encourage developers to pay their fair share; are not being considered
​Therefore, it is evident that the city has divested its responsibility to truly help the affordability crisis and instead is contributing directly to it!
​
I know the train has left the station. I know it would take true courage to stop it now. I ask that our city leaders have that courage!

Picture
* Seattle's current plan calls for 3 - 8% Set Asides, significantly below other major cities, but not set yet.
2 Comments
Michael Glover link
10/13/2022 06:09:15 am

Without already foreign financial center.
Day them want believe. Before number color top area may detail.
Administration sea major miss. Painting television past week third expect I.

Reply
Kenneth Haley link
10/29/2022 11:21:28 pm

Major its physical message once peace exist. Affect property action.
Want side above when ok computer meet. Management officer pay only happy lay hit city. Computer hair protect back.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Contact Us

Seattle Fair Growth
2442 NW Market Street, Box 487
Seattle, WA 98107
​sfg@seattlefairgrowth.org​

Subscribe

Join our mailing list today!
Join Now